Editorial policy

Bright Design Review aims to make design topics clear, accurate and useful without overstating what a detail can tell us. We show our reasoning and keep editorial judgment separate from paid promotion.

Accuracy and clarity

We check factual statements against reliable material available to us and take care with dates, terminology and claims about function or history. Where a point is uncertain or interpretations differ, we say so. Our articles explain general design ideas; they do not substitute for professional advice about a particular building, product or project.

Independence

Editorial decisions are made for their relevance to readers, not because a company or partner asks for coverage. A product, service or organization is not guaranteed a mention, favorable treatment or editorial approval through a partnership.

Corrections

If you spot a factual error or unclear passage, contact us through the Contact page and identify the article and point at issue. We review correction requests and amend material when warranted, making a clear note on substantial corrections where appropriate.

Paid and partner material

Paid placements and other partner material are clearly labelled so readers can distinguish them from editorial articles. Partner relationships do not determine the conclusions in editorial work.